ChatGPT assistance not authority

This source serves as a practical guide for understanding the operational boundaries of generative artificial intelligence. It emphasizes that while the technology excels at creative brainstorming and drafting documents, it lacks the reliability required for professional certifications or factual accuracy. Users are encouraged to view the software as a supplementary tool rather than a definitive authority, especially concerning legal or medical matters. By highlighting specific strengths and weaknesses, the text advocates for a workflow that prioritizes human verification. Ultimately, the material outlines a safe engagement strategy to ensure users do not over-rely on AI for critical decision-making.